← Back to Insights
Stop selling the asset. Price the outcome.
"Service contracts generate +25% higher margins than equipment sales. Near-zero churn. Rolls-Royce generates 69% of its revenue from long-term service agreements. The question is not whether servitization works. It is whether you have the model to price it profitably."
+25%
Margin premium on outcome-based service contracts vs equipment sales in heavy manufacturing.
69%
of Rolls-Royce FY2025 revenue from long-term service agreements. Services £7.2bn, +21% YoY. (RR FY2025 Results, 26 Feb 2026)
THE DECISION STAKES
Your customer buys uptime. You are still pricing hardware.
"All our original equipment contracts have now been successfully renegotiated. We have also now renegotiated the most significant onerous aftermarket contracts." — Tufan Erginbilgic, CEO Rolls-Royce, H1 2025 Results, 31 July 2025
The servitization decision is made once. The cost-to-serve model determines whether it creates margin or destroys it.
Most equipment manufacturers have the service concept. Few have the cost-to-serve model precise enough to price outcome contracts profitably.
THE DECISION TOOL
Four moves. One decision you can defend.
01
MAP
Identify candidate product lines using 3 filters: (1) measurable output metric (flight hours, m3, tonnes); (2) customer uptime dependency (their downtime is your liability); (3) service cost predictability from installed base data.
A product line that fails randomly cannot be priced as an outcome contract. Map installed base data before pricing the contract.
02
MODEL
Build the cost-to-serve P&L: failure probability curve by age cohort, mean time between failure, cost per service event, risk provision (typically 15-20% of contract value), and floor price below which the contract destroys margin.
The risk provision is not contingency. It is the price of the guarantee. Under-provision here and every onerous contract becomes a multi-year margin drain.
03
CONTRACT
Define the output metric precisely. Build pricing escalation tied to inflation and parts cost. Include a technology discontinuity clause. Set performance guarantees with remedy caps.
The contract that does not specify the output metric precisely creates the dispute. The one that does creates the annuity.
04
TRANSITION
Hardware revenue is recognized at delivery. Service revenue is recognized over contract life. The cash profile inverts. Model the revenue mix for 36 months to identify the worst-case P&L trough during the transition period.
The worst outcome is cannibalizing hardware margin before service contribution has matured. Do not accelerate the transition faster than the cost-to-serve model is calibrated.
Rolls-Royce
TotalCare - Power-by-the-Hour - FY2025 Full Year Results, 26 February 2026.
£3.5bn
Underlying operating profit FY2025, margin 17.3%. Up 40% vs FY2024. Five times higher than FY2022 (£652m). Services revenue £7.2bn, +21% YoY, representing 69% of group revenue. (Rolls-Royce Holdings FY2025 Full Year Results, 26 February 2026)
Rolls-Royce did not transform its commercial model in a year. The TotalCare framework was built over decades. But the financial consequence is now precise: in 2022, group operating profit was £652m. In 2025 it is £3.5bn, a 5x increase driven by service contract repricing, LTSA margin recovery on renegotiated contracts, and the compounding effect of an installed base that grows every time an engine is delivered. The lesson is not the scale of the outcome. It is the sequence: map the installed base, build the cost-to-serve model, reprice the contracts, and let the annuity compound.
Rolls-Royce did not grow operating profit 5x by selling more engines. It repriced service contracts that had been underpriced for a decade.
Download the full case
PDF · 5 slides · Free access · Downloaded 188 times
Key questions
When does outcome-based pricing create lock-in — and when does it create dependency?
Can the cost-to-serve model be built without 5+ years of installed base failure data?
How do you manage the P&L trough during the transition from hardware to service revenue?
Pre-decision checklist
MAP — completed
MODEL — completed
CONTRACT — completed
TRANSITION — completed
By Fabrice Macarty
This case resonates?
Stop pricing the asset. Start pricing the outcome. Map the installed base. Build the cost-to-serve model. Then reprice.
Start the conversation